While reading the Hicks chapter for this week’s class, I
couldn’t help thinking of the saying, “It’s not what you said, it’s how you
said it.” My husband is quite familiar with it after almost fifteen years of
marriage. Most people think of that saying in the context of relationships, but
it is just as applicable to the language arts classroom.
My creative writing class is in the midst of a poetry unit.
Throughout this unit, they’ve watched videos or listened to poets reading their
work as mentor texts. I’ve modeled how poetry should be read, as well – slowly,
deliberately accenting/punching certain words, and adjusting volume and pacing
to define tone. Still, when some students read a poem, they race through it
blindly and the audience misses the opportunity to glean meaning.
The Hicks chapter sparked an idea that I will implement in
my class this week. Hicks suggests that students value the process of recording
and re-recording their voices, although I would argue that most students won’t
like the sound of their voices at first. In my experience, hearing one’s voice
on a device is a jarring experience. Or maybe it’s just me, as I think I sound
like Fargo’s version of Fran Drescher.
Anyway, Hicks suggests that by “inviting students to record and listen
to their own voice can also open up conversations about dialect, multilingualism,
and the denotations and connotations of particular words and phrases (p. 103).
When students read a poem to the class, they’re probably not hearing what I’m
hearing. A million things could be racing through their heads, such as
self-consciousness at reading out loud to the class, insecurity about how well
they’re performing, or even preoccupation with whatever might seem more
important than being in the moment with their poem. I want them to hear what I hear, so I plan to give them this
homework assignment:
Choose one of the poems from your portfolio and record
yourself reading it. Listen to the recording and answer the following
questions:
1. Write about the pace in which you read your poem. What
did you notice about the pacing? Where in the poem could you adjust the speed
for emphasis or to set mood or tone?
2. What did you notice about the pitch of your voice? Could
you use a higher or lower sound for emphasis in certain places? What is the
intonation like?
3. How about your enunciation? Do you need to
over-exaggerate or “punch” the words in specific places for emphasis?
4. Does your oral delivery of the tone match the tone you
meant to convey in your writing? Why or why not?
5. Taking into consideration the answers to these questions,
re-record your poem and listen to it again. How has it changed?
Hopefully, by completing this activity students will discover
the strengths and weaknesses of their delivery for themselves, creating meta-awareness as to the power they carry with their voice. As a mentor text, I
will show this youTube video featuring Taylor Mali who performs his poem “Speak
with Conviction,” which uses humor to address the importance of what we say and
how we say it.
No comments:
Post a Comment